Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

Reply to message

* = Required fields
* Subject
* Body
Send reply to
Author (directly in email)
Please type the letters in the image above.

Original message

Author hlellelid
Full name Hans Lellelid
Date 2008-04-07 03:38:37 PDT
Message Alexander Kahl wrote:
> Hi Hans,
> Thank you very much for your efforts to solve this issue. I really like
> Propel and introduced it at work here, it saves us a lot of time in our
> projects - packaging Propel for the Fedora community is the least I can
> do to contribute back.
> On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 07:42 -0400, Hans Lellelid wrote:
>> I am not completely satisfied with this, as I feel the PHP license is
>> too free from obligation on derivative works; however, I am not willing
>> to put PHP sourcecode under the GPL. Unless version 3 is a "non-viral"
>> license, I think that this is extremely akward in a web development
>> environment (and code-generation environment).
> Isn't the LGPLv3 a good choice to solve all issues, non-affection of
> linking libraries, ensuring contribution back from derivative works and
> Apache-2.0 compatibility?

Oh ... yes, of course. I didn't realize that v3 was compatible w/
Apache 2. I didn't see it on the page listing acceptable licenses. Do
you have a link for that?

If that's the case, then this is easy. We'll just update to v3, make
that explicit in the headers and move along... :)