Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

Reply to message

* = Required fields
* Subject
* Body
Send reply to
Author (directly in email)
Please type the letters in the image above.

Original message

Author hlellelid
Full name Hans Lellelid
Date 2008-04-21 04:39:57 PDT
Message Hi Alex,

Alexander Kahl wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 07:01 -0400, Hans Lellelid wrote:
>> Furthermore, there's no consensus on the compatibility of v2 w/ Apache
>> license either. While FSF believes it incompatible, Apache apparently
>> believed that it was compatible before. It does seem there's consensus
>> on v3 being fine, though, so we'll stick with that (or later) moving
>> forward.
> Does that mean it's possible to use all Propel releases so far under the
> LGPLv3 (or LGPLv3+?) retroactively? Or do I have to wait for the next
> stable release to package Propel for Fedora?
> Hans, thanks again for your efforts!

I'm less certain on that question. I was hoping that I was going to get
that answered. I am inclined to think that as the source files did not
themselves specify or include a particular version, that we could
release a new package with an updated license. This I'm not 100% sure
on, though given that I've changed the text of the license on the
website (where the source files point), I'm personally comfortable with
releasing a package with newer license.txt or no license.txt at all
(since there are instructions for getting the license from
propel.phpdb.org in the header files).