Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

Reply to message

* = Required fields
* Subject
* Body
Send reply to
Author (directly in email)
Please type the letters in the image above.

Original message

Author =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?= <dz@bitxtender.com>
Full name =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?= <dz@bitxtender.com>
Date 2008-04-24 17:09:12 PDT
Message Am 21.04.2008 um 13:37 schrieb Alexander Kahl:

> On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 07:01 -0400, Hans Lellelid wrote:
>> Furthermore, there's no consensus on the compatibility of v2 w/
>> Apache
>> license either. While FSF believes it incompatible, Apache
>> apparently
>> believed that it was compatible before. It does seem there's
>> consensus
>> on v3 being fine, though, so we'll stick with that (or later) moving
>> forward.
> Does that mean it's possible to use all Propel releases so far under
> the
> LGPLv3 (or LGPLv3+?) retroactively? Or do I have to wait for the next
> stable release to package Propel for Fedora?

That is correct. You can "relicense" it yourself, the (L)GPL allows
this, because we did not explicitly specify a version number. The
other options projects have is to specify a version number, or a
version number "and any later version". The fact that we bundled v2.1
of the LGPL does not affect this possibility.