Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

Reply to message

* = Required fields
* Subject
* Body
Send reply to
Author (directly in email)
Please type the letters in the image above.

Original message

Author =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?= <dz@bitxtender.com>
Full name =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?= <dz@bitxtender.com>
Date 2007-11-16 06:36:22 PST
Message How bout something wicked such as having method bodies in an array,
with each line having a unique ID ;) That would be hax0r.

But seriously - yes, we need something like that. The more modular it
is, the better. But as you pointed out, it could be a bitch to design
- maybe we need alien technology from outer space to do that. Not
quite sure... :>


Am 16.11.2007 um 14:58 schrieb Ron Rademaker:

> Hans Lellelid wrote:
>> It becomes a little less clear to me when I think about a builder
>> advertising that it wants to override / customize other methods. I
>> guess the question is what happens when several builders want to
>> all add
>> custom behavior into the save method?
> I guess we could reevaluate the way classes are generated
> completely. Instead of passing along some string by reference and
> appending code in a function we could model the classes that are
> being generated and let the builders fill the model. Finally, some
> toString function on the model class creates the actual code. That
> way you don't have to create an entire function in one sweep but you
> can add, remove and change stuff later. Obviously, the model is
> gonna be a challenge to design :)
> Ron
> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org