Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

Discussions > dev > Re: [propel-dev] roadmap > Reply to message

propel
Reply to message

* = Required fields
* Subject
* Body
Attachments
Send reply to
Topic
Author (directly in email)
Please type the letters in the image above.

Original message

Author =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?= <dz@bitxtender.com>
Full name =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?= <dz@bitxtender.com>
Date 2006-03-28 08:15:03 PST
Message > Adding the pages sounds good to me. The only concern I have (which I
> can mention in comments on wiki too) is that certain methods (temporal
> methods) take additional parameters -- which might present a problem
> __call/__get/__set, unless we just standardize on an API that does not
> support these. Just something to discuss.

No problem IMHO, call_user_func_array() is our friend.

> We may also want to have the "lightweight" OM classes be an option.
> It'd be nice to have several different options for types of classes to
> generate, but I also recognize that these would have to be
> maintained :)

_Having_ them would be easy, but you're right, maintaining them would
be the real issue ;)

I added 4, 5 and 6 to the "known priorities". Or shall I move them to
the second list. What exactly is the difference anyway? ;)

- David