Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

propel
Reply to message

* = Required fields
* Subject
* Body
Attachments
Send reply to
Topic
Author (directly in email)
Please type the letters in the image above.

Original message

Author Cameron Brunner <cameron.brunner@gmail.com>
Full name Cameron Brunner <cameron.brunner@gmail.com>
Date 2006-10-02 22:41:01 PDT
Message Sorry if i sounded rather blunt in that message but there hasnt been
much work done on 2.0 for a while and im starting to hit some
performance related issues so i wanted to make sure if i jumped in the
deep end that i wouldnt make a mess of something someone else is
doing. I'm just going thru all these emails now and will work out what
i plan to do about it shortly.


Cameron

On 10/1/06, Hans Lellelid <hans at velum dot net> wrote:
> I would say that this effort should be coordinated with Alan. I think
> there already is an autoload patch in 1.3 (Alan?) -- and if not, I know
> that there is an implementation plan. Certainly no one is stopping you
> from proposing your own approach to autoload, but since there are people
> actively working/thinking on this issue, it's probably best to
> coordinate rather than simply committing code.
>
> Thanks-
> Hans
>
> Cameron Brunner wrote:
> > Any objections if i work on my own patch (and commit it once working)
> > to allow spl_autoload() to be used and required? As in no more ability
> > to disable the requirement of spl_autoload... The performance issues
> > with require_once in my setup are just getting insane and i keep
> > having to manually patch files every time i alter the database and
> > rebuild the propel classes...
> >
> >
> > Cameron