Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

propel
Reply to message

* = Required fields
* Subject
* Body
Attachments
Send reply to
Topic
Author (directly in email)
Please type the letters in the image above.

Original message

Author Alan Pinstein <apinstein@mac.com>
Full name Alan Pinstein <apinstein@mac.com>
Date 2006-10-04 07:52:18 PDT
Message But you still didn't answer my question? What is the benefit or
appropriate use of FETCH_INTO that otherwise wouldn't work? Why is it
needed at all?

Alan

On Oct 4, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Sven Tietje wrote:

> Alan Pinstein wrote:
>
> hi alan,
>
>> Eeeew. FETCH_INTO sounds awful. I cringe at the idea of how
>> many bugs
>> this causes with people not understanding references enough and
>> having FETCH_INTO cause terrible problems. It's 2006, we don't need
>> to re-use object shells! That is so not OO I don't even know how to
>> express it.
>>
>> FETCH_INTO seems like some odd hack around GC unless I am not seeing
>> something.
>>
>> Why is it needed?
>
> Ok... You are not a friend of FETCH_INTO - just mentioned it for
> reading and
> as possible option. If you know what it means: use it, where you need.
>
> By default propel should create a new instance for each row.
>
>> print "Querying for all properties to geocode...";
>> $c = new Criteria;
>> $c->add(MlsPrope​rtyPeer::GEOCODE_SCO​RE, 0); // only encode non-scored
>> items
>> $allPropsRS = MlsPropertyPeer::doS​electRS($c);
>> print "Done!\n";
>
>> $rowCount = 0;
>> $propArr = array();
>> while ($allPropsRS->next()) {
>> $prop = new MlsProperty;
>> $prop->hydrate($allPropsRS);
>> // do stuff
>> $rowCount++;
>> }
>
> Yes, of course it works, but i`m a friend of comfort :D Having a
> resultset
> and option to set is nice :D
>
> $rs = MlsPropertyPeer::doSelect($c);
> // now just wanna read with some special calculation functions
> $rs->setMode(Pro​pel::ONE_OBJECT /*FETCH_INTO*/);
>
> foreach ($rs as $row) {
> //do stuff
> }
>
> Of course, the iterator can work internally the way you mentioned
> above.
>
> Was just an idea to discuss. What do you think of using FETCH_CLASS?
>
> Alan, i am not against your hydrate-method - just wanna discuss the
> implementation of pdo-features.
>
> Greets sven
>
> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
>