Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

Reply to message

* = Required fields
* Subject
* Body
Send reply to
Author (directly in email)
Please type the letters in the image above.

Original message

Author Pedram Nimreezi <zenstyle@gmail.com>
Full name Pedram Nimreezi <zenstyle@gmail.com>
Date 2007-07-19 18:21:13 PDT
Message > >
> > anyway I think refactoring propel into a php extension is the
> > solution.

> this sounds like something that might work. what about actually
> extending PDO for this?

  that works...

> Whilst we are at it, how about a mapping configuration so you don't
> have to touch the classes/objects you want to persist in the db?

  I never do, in fact any object I generate (like Document.php
  which you're supposedly cool to edit. I leave be... I want a fully
abstracted model.
  so Im never going to make it impure by putting regular hand typed code
into it...
  I think the whole point is to automate the M.. the model layer.. the layer
in which
  any bug is likely to cause data corruption. So XML -> Data Objects and
that's it.
  This is why I think propel lends itself to web frameworks because the
  controller is a good place to wire these generated db objects together,
  set foreign dependency with the </foreign tag and the save and validate
inherits the
  proper methods to deal with an abstraction of the database table. keep the
  names not pluralized, lower cased with underscores and you're well

> I like a domain model that isn't fully aware of all the dependencies to
> whatever persistence engine is used.

  and with that, that's exactly what you'll get.

> AOP maybe? Ups another 'buzzword' :-)

  not really...not anymore than OCaml ;)