Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

Discussions > dev > Re: [propel-dev] Packaging another 1.3beta?

propel
Discussion topic

Hide all messages in topic

All messages in topic

Re: [propel-dev] Re: Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author Cameron Brunner <cameron dot brunner at gmail dot com>
Full name Cameron Brunner <cameron dot brunner at gmail dot com>
Date 2007-07-25 17:19:34 PDT
Message 1 in generator/classes/pr​opel/phing/PropelCre​oleTransformTask.php​ and
1 in uniquevalidator from memory, i did post a patch for the validator
a while back but i never tested it and noone else said
good/bad/otherwise so i never commit'd it

and no, nothing in contrib has eval in it

On 7/26/07, Hans Lellelid <hans at velum dot net> wrote:
> Where are the evals? Is this constant-building stuff in a contrib class?
>
> Hans
>
> Cameron Brunner wrote:
> > FWIW, something i consider a showstopper, propel 1.3 has aparently 2
> > eval's in the codebase. These need to go before the next beta! :) Can
> > we also add to the Coding Standards that eval is NEVER allowed?
> >
> > On 7/22/07, Cameron Brunner <cameron.brunner@​gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Is there anything major outstanding that needs to be organized before
> >> we consider another beta? Personally id like to see some form of the
> >> new debugging stuff go in (i'm cleaning up what i have locally over
> >> the weekend, its somewhat better already), anything else? and for that
> >> matter, has anything big changed? As far as i remember about all thats
> >> happened is the instance pool global enable/disable and something with
> >> datetime (but i think this was last version? or is it both?)
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cameron Brunner
> >>
> >> Want a better web browser?
> >> http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
>
>


--
Cameron Brunner

Want a better web browser?
http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1

Re: [propel-dev] Re: Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author hlellelid
Full name Hans Lellelid
Date 2007-07-25 17:14:04 PDT
Message Where are the evals? Is this constant-building stuff in a contrib class?

Hans

Cameron Brunner wrote:
> FWIW, something i consider a showstopper, propel 1.3 has aparently 2
> eval's in the codebase. These need to go before the next beta! :) Can
> we also add to the Coding Standards that eval is NEVER allowed?
>
> On 7/22/07, Cameron Brunner <cameron.brunner@​gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is there anything major outstanding that needs to be organized before
>> we consider another beta? Personally id like to see some form of the
>> new debugging stuff go in (i'm cleaning up what i have locally over
>> the weekend, its somewhat better already), anything else? and for that
>> matter, has anything big changed? As far as i remember about all thats
>> happened is the instance pool global enable/disable and something with
>> datetime (but i think this was last version? or is it both?)
>>
>> --
>> Cameron Brunner
>>
>> Want a better web browser?
>> http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
>>
>
>

Re: Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author Cameron Brunner <cameron dot brunner at gmail dot com>
Full name Cameron Brunner <cameron dot brunner at gmail dot com>
Date 2007-07-25 15:13:16 PDT
Message FWIW, something i consider a showstopper, propel 1.3 has aparently 2
eval's in the codebase. These need to go before the next beta! :) Can
we also add to the Coding Standards that eval is NEVER allowed?

On 7/22/07, Cameron Brunner <cameron.brunner@​gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there anything major outstanding that needs to be organized before
> we consider another beta? Personally id like to see some form of the
> new debugging stuff go in (i'm cleaning up what i have locally over
> the weekend, its somewhat better already), anything else? and for that
> matter, has anything big changed? As far as i remember about all thats
> happened is the instance pool global enable/disable and something with
> datetime (but i think this was last version? or is it both?)
>
> --
> Cameron Brunner
>
> Want a better web browser?
> http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
>


--
Cameron Brunner

Want a better web browser?
http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1

Re: [propel-dev] Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author Kevin Barnard <kevin dot barnard at gmail dot com>
Full name Kevin Barnard <kevin dot barnard at gmail dot com>
Date 2007-07-24 07:12:29 PDT
Message Thank you.

I'm not sure how this would break BC since this really only effects the
creation of a new table. If it does and you can point out in what regard
I'm more then happy to dive in and try to fix.

On 7/24/07, Hans Lellelid <hans at velum dot net> wrote:
>
> I will grant that Kevin clearly knows more than I do about SERIAL use in
> pgsql :) I always just create the sequences separately. If the patch
> attached to the ticket (http://propel.phpdb.​org/trac/ticket/4) does not
> break backwards compatibility or have other strange side-effects, then
> I'm for adding this in. If it does break BC, then we need at least to
> make this a build option.
>
> Hans
>
> Cameron Brunner wrote:
> > I'v read this a few times and my head hurts by the time i get to the
> > end of the email. I'll try reading it again when i wake up, hopefully
> > a clear head is more useful to understand what you are getting at.
> >
> > On 7/23/07, Kevin Barnard <kevin dot barnard at gmail dot com> wrote:
> >> It does two things that currently are not done. Both of which are
> >> really useful if you modify the database outside of Propel methods.
> >>
> >> First it creates and entry in pg_depend system catalog which helps out
> >> the DBA and any attempt to reverse engineer the DB.
> >>
> >> Secondly it ties the default column to the sequence. This could be
> >> done with an ALTER TABLE statement or by setting the default value for
> >> the column in the CREATE TABLE statement.
> >>
> >> This is allows for more sane SQL creation scripts from the XML. The
> >> alternative which I am currently using is to create the schema by hand
> >> the then use the id-method-parameter to specify the name.
> >>
> >> Does that make sense?
> >>
> >> There are a couple of things that can be cleaned up further to make
> >> this patch more sane. Namely moving table creation syntax into the DB
> >> Platform object but that's a pretty big deal and more of a 2.0 type
> >> issue. I'm getting my feet wet at this point.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/22/07, Cameron Brunner <cameron.brunner@​gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Its early and my head hurts but i'm not seeing a point to this patch
> >> > currently? Care to hit me in the face with a LART and try to explain
> >> > what can't be done now that this patch manages to accomplish? Serial
> >> > just creates an INT4 column with a default nextval(sequence), sets it
> >> > not null and makes the sequence itself... how is that different from
> >> > what we do now? We just do it by hand instead... did i miss
> something?
> >> >
> >> > On 7/23/07, Kevin Barnard <kevin dot barnard at gmail dot com> wrote:
> >> > > It would be nice if my patch to ticket 4 could make it in. This
> >> would
> >> > > really help when Propel moves into Symfony. Very small patch.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thank you
> >> > >
> >> > > On 7/21/07, Cameron Brunner <cameron.brunner@​gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > Is the next beta (perhaps the point in time to turn into rc) on
> the
> >> > > > 1st realistic to merge in your nested sets as well as hans to
> >> finish
> >> > > > the default work he was playing with? it will be long enough for
> >> me to
> >> > > > get debug fleshed out enough to be useful without bugs....
> >> > > >
> >> > > > did there end up a bug in time column handling as well or have
> >> we not
> >> > > > looked into it fully as yet?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Any users out there that want something in before this release
> >> or know
> >> > > > of any bugs, hit us up and voice your say, the sooner the
> >> better, i'm
> >> > > > personally dying for 1.3 to go 'stable'
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On 7/22/07, David Zülke <dz at bitxtender dot com> wrote:
> >> > > > > I'd like to merge in my nested sets branch. Set me a deadline,
> >> and I
> >> > > > > shall comply! :)
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > David
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Am 21.07.2007 um 18:32 schrieb Cameron Brunner:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Is there anything major outstanding that needs to be
> >> organized before
> >> > > > > > we consider another beta? Personally id like to see some
> >> form of the
> >> > > > > > new debugging stuff go in (i'm cleaning up what i have
> >> locally over
> >> > > > > > the weekend, its somewhat better already), anything else?
> >> and for that
> >> > > > > > matter, has anything big changed? As far as i remember about
> >> all thats
> >> > > > > > happened is the instance pool global enable/disable and
> >> something with
> >> > > > > > datetime (but i think this was last version? or is it both?)
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > Cameron Brunner
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Want a better web browser?
> >> > > > > > http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> >> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> >> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Cameron Brunner
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Want a better web browser?
> >> > > > http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Kevin Barnard
> >> > >
> >> > > "Great Beauty, great strength, and great Riches,
> >> > > are really and truly of no great Use;
> >> > > a right Heart exceeds all." -- Benjamin Franklin
> >> > >
> >> > >
> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Cameron Brunner
> >> >
> >> > Want a better web browser?
> >> > http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Kevin Barnard
> >>
> >> "Great Beauty, great strength, and great Riches,
> >> are really and truly of no great Use;
> >> a right Heart exceeds all." -- Benjamin Franklin
> >>
> >> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
>
>


--
Kevin Barnard

"Great Beauty, great strength, and great Riches,
are really and truly of no great Use;
a right Heart exceeds all." -- Benjamin Franklin
Attachments

Re: [propel-dev] Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author hlellelid
Full name Hans Lellelid
Date 2007-07-24 05:53:20 PDT
Message I will grant that Kevin clearly knows more than I do about SERIAL use in
pgsql :) I always just create the sequences separately. If the patch
attached to the ticket (http://propel.phpdb.​org/trac/ticket/4) does not
break backwards compatibility or have other strange side-effects, then
I'm for adding this in. If it does break BC, then we need at least to
make this a build option.

Hans

Cameron Brunner wrote:
> I'v read this a few times and my head hurts by the time i get to the
> end of the email. I'll try reading it again when i wake up, hopefully
> a clear head is more useful to understand what you are getting at.
>
> On 7/23/07, Kevin Barnard <kevin dot barnard at gmail dot com> wrote:
>> It does two things that currently are not done. Both of which are
>> really useful if you modify the database outside of Propel methods.
>>
>> First it creates and entry in pg_depend system catalog which helps out
>> the DBA and any attempt to reverse engineer the DB.
>>
>> Secondly it ties the default column to the sequence. This could be
>> done with an ALTER TABLE statement or by setting the default value for
>> the column in the CREATE TABLE statement.
>>
>> This is allows for more sane SQL creation scripts from the XML. The
>> alternative which I am currently using is to create the schema by hand
>> the then use the id-method-parameter to specify the name.
>>
>> Does that make sense?
>>
>> There are a couple of things that can be cleaned up further to make
>> this patch more sane. Namely moving table creation syntax into the DB
>> Platform object but that's a pretty big deal and more of a 2.0 type
>> issue. I'm getting my feet wet at this point.
>>
>>
>> On 7/22/07, Cameron Brunner <cameron.brunner@​gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Its early and my head hurts but i'm not seeing a point to this patch
>> > currently? Care to hit me in the face with a LART and try to explain
>> > what can't be done now that this patch manages to accomplish? Serial
>> > just creates an INT4 column with a default nextval(sequence), sets it
>> > not null and makes the sequence itself... how is that different from
>> > what we do now? We just do it by hand instead... did i miss something?
>> >
>> > On 7/23/07, Kevin Barnard <kevin dot barnard at gmail dot com> wrote:
>> > > It would be nice if my patch to ticket 4 could make it in. This
>> would
>> > > really help when Propel moves into Symfony. Very small patch.
>> > >
>> > > Thank you
>> > >
>> > > On 7/21/07, Cameron Brunner <cameron.brunner@​gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > Is the next beta (perhaps the point in time to turn into rc) on the
>> > > > 1st realistic to merge in your nested sets as well as hans to
>> finish
>> > > > the default work he was playing with? it will be long enough for
>> me to
>> > > > get debug fleshed out enough to be useful without bugs....
>> > > >
>> > > > did there end up a bug in time column handling as well or have
>> we not
>> > > > looked into it fully as yet?
>> > > >
>> > > > Any users out there that want something in before this release
>> or know
>> > > > of any bugs, hit us up and voice your say, the sooner the
>> better, i'm
>> > > > personally dying for 1.3 to go 'stable'
>> > > >
>> > > > On 7/22/07, David Zülke <dz at bitxtender dot com> wrote:
>> > > > > I'd like to merge in my nested sets branch. Set me a deadline,
>> and I
>> > > > > shall comply! :)
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > David
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Am 21.07.2007 um 18:32 schrieb Cameron Brunner:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Is there anything major outstanding that needs to be
>> organized before
>> > > > > > we consider another beta? Personally id like to see some
>> form of the
>> > > > > > new debugging stuff go in (i'm cleaning up what i have
>> locally over
>> > > > > > the weekend, its somewhat better already), anything else?
>> and for that
>> > > > > > matter, has anything big changed? As far as i remember about
>> all thats
>> > > > > > happened is the instance pool global enable/disable and
>> something with
>> > > > > > datetime (but i think this was last version? or is it both?)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > Cameron Brunner
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Want a better web browser?
>> > > > > > http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
>> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
>> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
>> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
>> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Cameron Brunner
>> > > >
>> > > > Want a better web browser?
>> > > > http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Kevin Barnard
>> > >
>> > > "Great Beauty, great strength, and great Riches,
>> > > are really and truly of no great Use;
>> > > a right Heart exceeds all." -- Benjamin Franklin
>> > >
>> > > --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cameron Brunner
>> >
>> > Want a better web browser?
>> > http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kevin Barnard
>>
>> "Great Beauty, great strength, and great Riches,
>> are really and truly of no great Use;
>> a right Heart exceeds all." -- Benjamin Franklin
>>
>> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [propel-dev] Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author Cameron Brunner <cameron dot brunner at gmail dot com>
Full name Cameron Brunner <cameron dot brunner at gmail dot com>
Date 2007-07-24 03:45:34 PDT
Message I'v read this a few times and my head hurts by the time i get to the
end of the email. I'll try reading it again when i wake up, hopefully
a clear head is more useful to understand what you are getting at.

On 7/23/07, Kevin Barnard <kevin dot barnard at gmail dot com> wrote:
> It does two things that currently are not done. Both of which are
> really useful if you modify the database outside of Propel methods.
>
> First it creates and entry in pg_depend system catalog which helps out
> the DBA and any attempt to reverse engineer the DB.
>
> Secondly it ties the default column to the sequence. This could be
> done with an ALTER TABLE statement or by setting the default value for
> the column in the CREATE TABLE statement.
>
> This is allows for more sane SQL creation scripts from the XML. The
> alternative which I am currently using is to create the schema by hand
> the then use the id-method-parameter to specify the name.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> There are a couple of things that can be cleaned up further to make
> this patch more sane. Namely moving table creation syntax into the DB
> Platform object but that's a pretty big deal and more of a 2.0 type
> issue. I'm getting my feet wet at this point.
>
>
> On 7/22/07, Cameron Brunner <cameron.brunner@​gmail.com> wrote:
> > Its early and my head hurts but i'm not seeing a point to this patch
> > currently? Care to hit me in the face with a LART and try to explain
> > what can't be done now that this patch manages to accomplish? Serial
> > just creates an INT4 column with a default nextval(sequence), sets it
> > not null and makes the sequence itself... how is that different from
> > what we do now? We just do it by hand instead... did i miss something?
> >
> > On 7/23/07, Kevin Barnard <kevin dot barnard at gmail dot com> wrote:
> > > It would be nice if my patch to ticket 4 could make it in. This would
> > > really help when Propel moves into Symfony. Very small patch.
> > >
> > > Thank you
> > >
> > > On 7/21/07, Cameron Brunner <cameron.brunner@​gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Is the next beta (perhaps the point in time to turn into rc) on the
> > > > 1st realistic to merge in your nested sets as well as hans to finish
> > > > the default work he was playing with? it will be long enough for me to
> > > > get debug fleshed out enough to be useful without bugs....
> > > >
> > > > did there end up a bug in time column handling as well or have we not
> > > > looked into it fully as yet?
> > > >
> > > > Any users out there that want something in before this release or know
> > > > of any bugs, hit us up and voice your say, the sooner the better, i'm
> > > > personally dying for 1.3 to go 'stable'
> > > >
> > > > On 7/22/07, David Zülke <dz at bitxtender dot com> wrote:
> > > > > I'd like to merge in my nested sets branch. Set me a deadline, and I
> > > > > shall comply! :)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > David
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Am 21.07.2007 um 18:32 schrieb Cameron Brunner:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Is there anything major outstanding that needs to be organized before
> > > > > > we consider another beta? Personally id like to see some form of the
> > > > > > new debugging stuff go in (i'm cleaning up what i have locally over
> > > > > > the weekend, its somewhat better already), anything else? and for that
> > > > > > matter, has anything big changed? As far as i remember about all thats
> > > > > > happened is the instance pool global enable/disable and something with
> > > > > > datetime (but i think this was last version? or is it both?)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Cameron Brunner
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Want a better web browser?
> > > > > > http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Cameron Brunner
> > > >
> > > > Want a better web browser?
> > > > http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Kevin Barnard
> > >
> > > "Great Beauty, great strength, and great Riches,
> > > are really and truly of no great Use;
> > > a right Heart exceeds all." -- Benjamin Franklin
> > >
> > > --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cameron Brunner
> >
> > Want a better web browser?
> > http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
> >
>
>
> --
> Kevin Barnard
>
> "Great Beauty, great strength, and great Riches,
> are really and truly of no great Use;
> a right Heart exceeds all." -- Benjamin Franklin
>
> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
>
>


--
Cameron Brunner

Want a better web browser?
http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1

Re: [propel-dev] Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author Kevin Barnard <kevin dot barnard at gmail dot com>
Full name Kevin Barnard <kevin dot barnard at gmail dot com>
Date 2007-07-22 16:29:03 PDT
Message It does two things that currently are not done. Both of which are
really useful if you modify the database outside of Propel methods.

First it creates and entry in pg_depend system catalog which helps out
the DBA and any attempt to reverse engineer the DB.

Secondly it ties the default column to the sequence. This could be
done with an ALTER TABLE statement or by setting the default value for
the column in the CREATE TABLE statement.

This is allows for more sane SQL creation scripts from the XML. The
alternative which I am currently using is to create the schema by hand
the then use the id-method-parameter to specify the name.

Does that make sense?

There are a couple of things that can be cleaned up further to make
this patch more sane. Namely moving table creation syntax into the DB
Platform object but that's a pretty big deal and more of a 2.0 type
issue. I'm getting my feet wet at this point.


On 7/22/07, Cameron Brunner <cameron.brunner@​gmail.com> wrote:
> Its early and my head hurts but i'm not seeing a point to this patch
> currently? Care to hit me in the face with a LART and try to explain
> what can't be done now that this patch manages to accomplish? Serial
> just creates an INT4 column with a default nextval(sequence), sets it
> not null and makes the sequence itself... how is that different from
> what we do now? We just do it by hand instead... did i miss something?
>
> On 7/23/07, Kevin Barnard <kevin dot barnard at gmail dot com> wrote:
> > It would be nice if my patch to ticket 4 could make it in. This would
> > really help when Propel moves into Symfony. Very small patch.
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > On 7/21/07, Cameron Brunner <cameron.brunner@​gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Is the next beta (perhaps the point in time to turn into rc) on the
> > > 1st realistic to merge in your nested sets as well as hans to finish
> > > the default work he was playing with? it will be long enough for me to
> > > get debug fleshed out enough to be useful without bugs....
> > >
> > > did there end up a bug in time column handling as well or have we not
> > > looked into it fully as yet?
> > >
> > > Any users out there that want something in before this release or know
> > > of any bugs, hit us up and voice your say, the sooner the better, i'm
> > > personally dying for 1.3 to go 'stable'
> > >
> > > On 7/22/07, David Zülke <dz at bitxtender dot com> wrote:
> > > > I'd like to merge in my nested sets branch. Set me a deadline, and I
> > > > shall comply! :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > David
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Am 21.07.2007 um 18:32 schrieb Cameron Brunner:
> > > >
> > > > > Is there anything major outstanding that needs to be organized before
> > > > > we consider another beta? Personally id like to see some form of the
> > > > > new debugging stuff go in (i'm cleaning up what i have locally over
> > > > > the weekend, its somewhat better already), anything else? and for that
> > > > > matter, has anything big changed? As far as i remember about all thats
> > > > > happened is the instance pool global enable/disable and something with
> > > > > datetime (but i think this was last version? or is it both?)
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Cameron Brunner
> > > > >
> > > > > Want a better web browser?
> > > > > http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
> > > > >
> > > > > --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cameron Brunner
> > >
> > > Want a better web browser?
> > > http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Kevin Barnard
> >
> > "Great Beauty, great strength, and great Riches,
> > are really and truly of no great Use;
> > a right Heart exceeds all." -- Benjamin Franklin
> >
> > --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Cameron Brunner
>
> Want a better web browser?
> http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
>


--
Kevin Barnard

"Great Beauty, great strength, and great Riches,
 are really and truly of no great Use;
 a right Heart exceeds all." -- Benjamin Franklin

Re: [propel-dev] Re: Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author hlellelid
Full name Hans Lellelid
Date 2007-07-22 15:51:53 PDT
Message David Zülke wrote:
> Am 22.07.2007 um 22:52 schrieb Cameron Brunner:
>
>> Just going through the tickets, anyone want to have a look at these...
>>
>> http://propel.phpdb.​org/trac/ticket/424 - should be easy in the
>> generator but i dont know the generator internals
>
> fix'd
>
>
>> http://propel.phpdb.​org/trac/ticket/404 - is this still a problem? its
>> been a while
>
> Can we just use the fix suggested there? Hans?
>

I'm not sure ... It doesn't seem right, but I've never used the
packageObjectModel stuff. I'll try to look at this over next day or so
and commit the correct fix (which may be the fix suggested, I'm just not
sure I fully understand the problem yet).

Hans

Re: [propel-dev] Re: Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author Cameron Brunner <cameron dot brunner at gmail dot com>
Full name Cameron Brunner <cameron dot brunner at gmail dot com>
Date 2007-07-22 14:11:59 PDT
Message Just replied on the cvs list about the 424 fix, is it easy to go
through all tables before throwing an exception and list all the
tables missing pk's?

On 7/23/07, David Zülke <dz at bitxtender dot com> wrote:
> Am 22.07.2007 um 22:52 schrieb Cameron Brunner:
>
> > Just going through the tickets, anyone want to have a look at these...
> >
> > http://propel.phpdb.​org/trac/ticket/424 - should be easy in the
> > generator but i dont know the generator internals
>
> fix'd
>
>
> > http://propel.phpdb.​org/trac/ticket/404 - is this still a problem? its
> > been a while
>
> Can we just use the fix suggested there? Hans?
>
>
> David
>
> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
>
>


--
Cameron Brunner

Want a better web browser?
http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1

Re: [propel-dev] Re: Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?= <dz at bitxtender dot com>
Full name =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?= <dz at bitxtender dot com>
Date 2007-07-22 14:09:58 PDT
Message Am 22.07.2007 um 22:52 schrieb Cameron Brunner:

> Just going through the tickets, anyone want to have a look at these...
>
> http://propel.phpdb.​org/trac/ticket/424 - should be easy in the
> generator but i dont know the generator internals

fix'd


> http://propel.phpdb.​org/trac/ticket/404 - is this still a problem? its
> been a while

Can we just use the fix suggested there? Hans?


David

Re: Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author Cameron Brunner <cameron dot brunner at gmail dot com>
Full name Cameron Brunner <cameron dot brunner at gmail dot com>
Date 2007-07-22 13:52:10 PDT
Message Just going through the tickets, anyone want to have a look at these...

http://propel.phpdb.​org/trac/ticket/424 - should be easy in the
generator but i dont know the generator internals
http://propel.phpdb.​org/trac/ticket/404 - is this still a problem? its
been a while


On 7/22/07, Cameron Brunner <cameron.brunner@​gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there anything major outstanding that needs to be organized before
> we consider another beta? Personally id like to see some form of the
> new debugging stuff go in (i'm cleaning up what i have locally over
> the weekend, its somewhat better already), anything else? and for that
> matter, has anything big changed? As far as i remember about all thats
> happened is the instance pool global enable/disable and something with
> datetime (but i think this was last version? or is it both?)
>
> --
> Cameron Brunner
>
> Want a better web browser?
> http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
>


--
Cameron Brunner

Want a better web browser?
http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1

Re: [propel-dev] Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author Cameron Brunner <cameron dot brunner at gmail dot com>
Full name Cameron Brunner <cameron dot brunner at gmail dot com>
Date 2007-07-22 13:37:57 PDT
Message Its early and my head hurts but i'm not seeing a point to this patch
currently? Care to hit me in the face with a LART and try to explain
what can't be done now that this patch manages to accomplish? Serial
just creates an INT4 column with a default nextval(sequence), sets it
not null and makes the sequence itself... how is that different from
what we do now? We just do it by hand instead... did i miss something?

On 7/23/07, Kevin Barnard <kevin dot barnard at gmail dot com> wrote:
> It would be nice if my patch to ticket 4 could make it in. This would
> really help when Propel moves into Symfony. Very small patch.
>
> Thank you
>
> On 7/21/07, Cameron Brunner <cameron.brunner@​gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is the next beta (perhaps the point in time to turn into rc) on the
> > 1st realistic to merge in your nested sets as well as hans to finish
> > the default work he was playing with? it will be long enough for me to
> > get debug fleshed out enough to be useful without bugs....
> >
> > did there end up a bug in time column handling as well or have we not
> > looked into it fully as yet?
> >
> > Any users out there that want something in before this release or know
> > of any bugs, hit us up and voice your say, the sooner the better, i'm
> > personally dying for 1.3 to go 'stable'
> >
> > On 7/22/07, David Zülke <dz at bitxtender dot com> wrote:
> > > I'd like to merge in my nested sets branch. Set me a deadline, and I
> > > shall comply! :)
> > >
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 21.07.2007 um 18:32 schrieb Cameron Brunner:
> > >
> > > > Is there anything major outstanding that needs to be organized before
> > > > we consider another beta? Personally id like to see some form of the
> > > > new debugging stuff go in (i'm cleaning up what i have locally over
> > > > the weekend, its somewhat better already), anything else? and for that
> > > > matter, has anything big changed? As far as i remember about all thats
> > > > happened is the instance pool global enable/disable and something with
> > > > datetime (but i think this was last version? or is it both?)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Cameron Brunner
> > > >
> > > > Want a better web browser?
> > > > http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
> > > >
> > > > --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cameron Brunner
> >
> > Want a better web browser?
> > http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
> >
>
>
> --
> Kevin Barnard
>
> "Great Beauty, great strength, and great Riches,
> are really and truly of no great Use;
> a right Heart exceeds all." -- Benjamin Franklin
>
> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
>
>


--
Cameron Brunner

Want a better web browser?
http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1

Re: [propel-dev] Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author Kevin Barnard <kevin dot barnard at gmail dot com>
Full name Kevin Barnard <kevin dot barnard at gmail dot com>
Date 2007-07-22 08:27:53 PDT
Message It would be nice if my patch to ticket 4 could make it in. This would
really help when Propel moves into Symfony. Very small patch.

Thank you

On 7/21/07, Cameron Brunner <cameron.brunner@​gmail.com> wrote:
> Is the next beta (perhaps the point in time to turn into rc) on the
> 1st realistic to merge in your nested sets as well as hans to finish
> the default work he was playing with? it will be long enough for me to
> get debug fleshed out enough to be useful without bugs....
>
> did there end up a bug in time column handling as well or have we not
> looked into it fully as yet?
>
> Any users out there that want something in before this release or know
> of any bugs, hit us up and voice your say, the sooner the better, i'm
> personally dying for 1.3 to go 'stable'
>
> On 7/22/07, David Zülke <dz at bitxtender dot com> wrote:
> > I'd like to merge in my nested sets branch. Set me a deadline, and I
> > shall comply! :)
> >
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 21.07.2007 um 18:32 schrieb Cameron Brunner:
> >
> > > Is there anything major outstanding that needs to be organized before
> > > we consider another beta? Personally id like to see some form of the
> > > new debugging stuff go in (i'm cleaning up what i have locally over
> > > the weekend, its somewhat better already), anything else? and for that
> > > matter, has anything big changed? As far as i remember about all thats
> > > happened is the instance pool global enable/disable and something with
> > > datetime (but i think this was last version? or is it both?)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cameron Brunner
> > >
> > > Want a better web browser?
> > > http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
> > >
> > > --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Cameron Brunner
>
> Want a better web browser?
> http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
>


--
Kevin Barnard

"Great Beauty, great strength, and great Riches,
 are really and truly of no great Use;
 a right Heart exceeds all." -- Benjamin Franklin

Re: [propel-dev] Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author Cameron Brunner <cameron dot brunner at gmail dot com>
Full name Cameron Brunner <cameron dot brunner at gmail dot com>
Date 2007-07-21 16:29:25 PDT
Message Is the next beta (perhaps the point in time to turn into rc) on the
1st realistic to merge in your nested sets as well as hans to finish
the default work he was playing with? it will be long enough for me to
get debug fleshed out enough to be useful without bugs....

did there end up a bug in time column handling as well or have we not
looked into it fully as yet?

Any users out there that want something in before this release or know
of any bugs, hit us up and voice your say, the sooner the better, i'm
personally dying for 1.3 to go 'stable'

On 7/22/07, David Zülke <dz at bitxtender dot com> wrote:
> I'd like to merge in my nested sets branch. Set me a deadline, and I
> shall comply! :)
>
>
> David
>
>
>
> Am 21.07.2007 um 18:32 schrieb Cameron Brunner:
>
> > Is there anything major outstanding that needs to be organized before
> > we consider another beta? Personally id like to see some form of the
> > new debugging stuff go in (i'm cleaning up what i have locally over
> > the weekend, its somewhat better already), anything else? and for that
> > matter, has anything big changed? As far as i remember about all thats
> > happened is the instance pool global enable/disable and something with
> > datetime (but i think this was last version? or is it both?)
> >
> > --
> > Cameron Brunner
> >
> > Want a better web browser?
> > http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
> >
> > --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
> >
> >
>
> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
>
>


--
Cameron Brunner

Want a better web browser?
http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1

Re: [propel-dev] Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?= <dz at bitxtender dot com>
Full name =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?= <dz at bitxtender dot com>
Date 2007-07-21 13:59:42 PDT
Message I'd like to merge in my nested sets branch. Set me a deadline, and I
shall comply! :)


David



Am 21.07.2007 um 18:32 schrieb Cameron Brunner:

> Is there anything major outstanding that needs to be organized before
> we consider another beta? Personally id like to see some form of the
> new debugging stuff go in (i'm cleaning up what i have locally over
> the weekend, its somewhat better already), anything else? and for that
> matter, has anything big changed? As far as i remember about all thats
> happened is the instance pool global enable/disable and something with
> datetime (but i think this was last version? or is it both?)
>
> --
> Cameron Brunner
>
> Want a better web browser?
> http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
>
> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
>
>

RE: [propel-dev] Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author Soenke Ruempler - NorthClick <soenke dot ruempler at northclick dot de>
Full name Soenke Ruempler - NorthClick <soenke dot ruempler at northclick dot de>
Date 2007-07-21 10:05:03 PDT
Message Hans Lellelid <mailto:hans at velum dot net> wrote on Saturday, July 21, 2007 7:03
PM:

> ;) Not yet -- and her last name is Sauër. :) I used to go by
> Laurent, my step-family's last name -- and changed it recently when
> sending an old friend an email (so they'd realize who it was).
>
> Heh - sorry for the confusion. David & Cameron were asking about
> that too. All back to normal now. :)

Hehe, allright! Have a nice weekend guys!

-soenke

Re: [propel-dev] Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author hlellelid
Full name Hans Lellelid
Date 2007-07-21 10:03:16 PDT
Message ;) Not yet -- and her last name is Sauër. :) I used to go by Laurent,
my step-family's last name -- and changed it recently when sending an
old friend an email (so they'd realize who it was).

Heh - sorry for the confusion. David & Cameron were asking about that
too. All back to normal now. :)

Hans

Soenke Ruempler - NorthClick wrote:
> OT: Hans, did you marry? ;-)
>
> Hans Laurent <mailto:hans at velum dot net> wrote on Saturday, July 21, 2007 6:52
> PM:
>
>> I don't think there's anything major. I wanted to finish fleshing
>> out the new default value/expression stuff. The current behavior
>> works, but
>> I think Alan had some great ideas ... I just haven't had
>> further time to
>> devote to that. There may be a couple minor issues that should be
>> addressed, but we can always roll a new beta.
>
> --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@prop​el.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at propel dot tigris dot org
>

RE: [propel-dev] Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author Soenke Ruempler - NorthClick <soenke dot ruempler at northclick dot de>
Full name Soenke Ruempler - NorthClick <soenke dot ruempler at northclick dot de>
Date 2007-07-21 09:53:30 PDT
Message OT: Hans, did you marry? ;-)

Hans Laurent <mailto:hans at velum dot net> wrote on Saturday, July 21, 2007 6:52
PM:

> I don't think there's anything major. I wanted to finish fleshing
> out the new default value/expression stuff. The current behavior
> works, but
> I think Alan had some great ideas ... I just haven't had
> further time to
> devote to that. There may be a couple minor issues that should be
> addressed, but we can always roll a new beta.

Re: [propel-dev] Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author hlellelid
Full name Hans Lellelid
Date 2007-07-21 09:52:08 PDT
Message I don't think there's anything major. I wanted to finish fleshing out
the new default value/expression stuff. The current behavior works, but
I think Alan had some great ideas ... I just haven't had further time to
devote to that. There may be a couple minor issues that should be
addressed, but we can always roll a new beta.

Hans

Cameron Brunner wrote:
> Is there anything major outstanding that needs to be organized before
> we consider another beta? Personally id like to see some form of the
> new debugging stuff go in (i'm cleaning up what i have locally over
> the weekend, its somewhat better already), anything else? and for that
> matter, has anything big changed? As far as i remember about all thats
> happened is the instance pool global enable/disable and something with
> datetime (but i think this was last version? or is it both?)
>

Packaging another 1.3beta?

Reply

Author Cameron Brunner <cameron dot brunner at gmail dot com>
Full name Cameron Brunner <cameron dot brunner at gmail dot com>
Date 2007-07-21 09:32:28 PDT
Message Is there anything major outstanding that needs to be organized before
we consider another beta? Personally id like to see some form of the
new debugging stuff go in (i'm cleaning up what i have locally over
the weekend, its somewhat better already), anything else? and for that
matter, has anything big changed? As far as i remember about all thats
happened is the instance pool global enable/disable and something with
datetime (but i think this was last version? or is it both?)

--
Cameron Brunner

Want a better web browser?
http://www.spreadfir​efox.com/?q=affiliat​es&id=182780​&t=1
Messages per page: